Interesting perspective, considering a paper ByteDance just released yesterday [1] has much worse video quality. If your comparison is to real videos, then for sure the quality isn't great. If instead you compare to other released research, the this model is one of the best released thus far.

[1]: https://epiphqny.github.io/Loong-video/

doesn't need to be movie quality, just needs to be tiktok quality and this totally passes the bar.

Are you ready to become a penguin in all of your posts to maximise aquatic engagement? I am.

The spinning fire was one that could easily fool me if a 0.5 shot was in a music video. Context is everything.

I have not had the same feeling as you and i do look at ai art for quite. awhile.

Are you still impressed though?

Yeah, some were impressive, but others looked quite bad. The guy running in the desert looked like a guy floating over the ground only sporadically making contact with the sand. The footfalls in a lot of these videos look pretty janky or "soft".

The clothing changes also have pretty rough edges, or just look like they're floating over the original model. The 3D glasses one looked atrocious. The lighting changes are also pretty lacking.