Unless there is hard evidence, I'd consider this a waste of time. I don't know the purpose of "revealing" Satoshi if he's someone who doesn't want the attention.
Could you provide some instances of how hard evidence might look like?
Proof, something that people can observe and recognize as true, not just circumstantial evidence. They should avoid repeating the Dorian Nakamoto situation.
Sure, but how would such a proof look like? How could one prove to be the real Nakamoto?