Hacker News Reader

Did Sable give up ALL its patents, or only the patents involved in the Cloudflare case? The picture of the document refers to the "Sable Patents", which I would suspect are defined in the context of the court case and therefore are only the ones relevant to that case?

View on HN

I read it as “giving up the patents in the portfolio that they acquired from that other company in 2006”.

Still not very clear to me either. Probably intentional, since CF seems to want to send the message that “mess with us and in the end you’ll give up all your patents somehow”

Reply on news.ycombinator.com