Hacker News Reader

Comment by infecto | Hacker News Reader

How so? Their implementation was interesting but I think it missed the whole setup on what did and did not work on the LLM side. Have just a few of those details would have made it very interesting. As it stands its really hard to decide if LLM is or is not the way.

If you have such an opinion why not share how I could communicate it better?

View on HN

Your line about the parent commenter's bias was weird and rude. You've never met the person and are accusing them of something you're in the process of doing yourself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cJO7pkx2jQ

Darn I hate being weird. Thanks!

It was very rude.

Wow!

Your comment is perfectly fine - obviously. You even used 'seems'. You even even saved me from wasting my time reading another bullshit article about LLMs from someone who can't be bothered to learn anything about them. Thanks!

"If it didn't work you didn't believe hard enough" also known as "Real Communism has never been tried" or "Conservatism never fails, it can only be failed" is a sort of... information-free stock position.

Basically, if thing is good it needs to still be good when tried in the real world by flawed humans, so if someone says "I tried thing and it didn't work" replying with "well maybe thing is good but you suck" isn't productive.

Sorry I think it’s totally justified to question an article when they provided nothing more beyond we tried and it did not work. The whole premise was can it be done but it was missing basic information to draw a conclusion.

Now maybe I was too weird in my response to the OP but it really went into a LLMs are bad narrative.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com