mostly what i offer 'in return' is more free software, which is also how, for example, the vim and gcc teams support each other, for the most part
i'm surprised to see your comment because i thought you were old enough to know this already
mostly what i offer 'in return' is more free software, which is also how, for example, the vim and gcc teams support each other, for the most part
i'm surprised to see your comment because i thought you were old enough to know this already
And also to remember Public Domain and the various flavours of Shareware and Demos, which is what Open Core/Dual Licensing are nowadays, by another name.
i agree that open-core is little more than shareware. dual-licensing is a different model, one pioneered by peter deutsch in the early 90s
this is ground we explored extensively on the fsb mailing list in the late 90s. if you're interested in my current thinking on the relationship between markets and open-source knowledge sharing, i've just written a somewhat longer note at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41696527
I don't know what solution you're promoting because Free Software still works. The professional for-profit software industry is in the toilet right now - Open Source is destroying it in a certain for-profit purview.