Saying that, this is a submission with a fairly technical focus, especially when compared to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41391684 and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41106977 (both of which are luckily [dead]).
Saying that, this is a submission with a fairly technical focus, especially when compared to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41391684 and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41106977 (both of which are luckily [dead]).
This is not a court of law. One small likely temporary event is not a pattern.
https://x.com/LifeArtStudios/status/1840342627717152786
> that is the last thing you want to see
That’s hyperbolic. I can think of several things that would be worse and far more impactful. For example: deleting the repo, changing the license, and going to work for Unity.
> this is a submission with a fairly technical focus
It’s one person complaining of being blocked on social media ad threatening to stop their 100€ support.
https://x.com/LifeArtStudios/status/1840349953610109352
There’s no technical focus here, this is internet drama getting more out of hand than it deserves.
> It’s one person complaining of being blocked on social media ad threatening to stop their 100€ support.
There is evidence that directly contradicts this: https://x.com/Xrayez/status/1839981060853043696 (subsequent thread is also interesting to read, both from technical and group dynamics perspective)
> There’s no technical focus here, this is internet drama getting more out of hand than it deserves.
What was the focus of the two (dead) submissions posted from your account linked above?
This one highlights a situation that affects a technical project, its continued community health and future contributions to its development.
Either way, trawling through history to find something unrelated to nitpick is quite the bad faith argument. You have your fair share of downvoted comments too, but I’m not about to bring those up for a conversation that has nothing to do with those.
Side note: I'm not a conservative.