Steve Jobs Swore the 10-Minute Rule Made Him Smarter. He Was Right
inc.com
inc.com
Withholding my individual clicks has zero impact on the clickbait economy, but I still feel a twinge of humiliation whenever I'm duped into clicking through.
Both long periods of sitting at your regular desk or standing at a standing desk are not good for you. For computer work what is best from a health standpoint is to work at a desk with a chain, monitor, keyboard, and mouse that have all been placed and adjusted for good ergonomics, and every 20-30 minutes stand up and move around for a few minutes. See [1].
The moving around doesn't have to be vigorous exercise. Just walking around is good enough, such as one of your trips to the toilet.
I find it interesting that taking a break for a few minutes every 20-30 minutes fits in with the "Pomodoro" system of time management. In that system you split your work day into 25 minute segments where you actively work, separated by short breaks.
I've not seen anything on why they picked 25 minutes for Pomodoro. I wonder if it is just a coincidence that it is close to how often you should take breaks for physical health reasons.
It took me a while to parse this correctly, for a second there I envisioned something else.
> Pomodoro
I agree, though I find that it has to be unconscious breaks for me. Having a timer to tell me when to stop focusing is a no-no.
I'd put on a CD and go to work on something. Unlike a timer going off the CD finishing wasn't really an interruption, but I would be aware of it enough to decide if should just put on another CD and keep going (which I could do well enough on autopilot to do without losing focus) or if I was actually near a good point to take a break.
We did a lot of contract work writing firmware for hardware makers, and I was supposed to track how much time I spend on each project so we could bill appropriately. That fit in well with the CD system. I just had to put all the CDs I used while working on a given project into a pile for that project, and at the end of the day add up the runtimes of them all to get the time spent on that project.
> It is indeed a valuable solution, we’ve know this for a long time,
The number of times I've had to practically kidnap some brilliant engineer and take them to an arcade or a bowling alley or someplace like that to make them stop sitting all day at their desk trying to think past some hard problem they were stuck on suggests that it is not as well known as it should be.
You think “normal people” can’t understand “go for a walk” as a rule? Non-programmers aren’t dunces. You don’t need to be overly literal to understand click bait.
> it is not as well known
I didn’t mean it in the sense of “everyone knows this” but as “the body of evidence for the claim is strong”.
Jokes aside - completely agree, pretty much the same for me.
But I've found as often the obvious brilliant solution while I'm away from the problem doesn't survive 5 minutes contact with all the constraints I forgot about while I was away from it.
Basically I think we count the hits, and discount the grind necessary to produce them.
Distance might help me see something I had missed, but that is an exceeding rarity. If getting away for a moment was magic we'd be in a nicer place. Everybody poops. Fewer put in effort.
Also, when I do other type of chores in my garden helps quite a lot!
In my opinion, when I finally give up and go for a walk/chore, my brain is so bored by the boring task that it stops procrastinating and actually focuses on the problem.
Another effective hack is to verbally talk about the problem to someone else. That seems to change how the brain processes things and that new perspectives can find the answers internalizing could not.
Anything under a few kilometers I just walk it . Anything over requires a bit of planning. My commute these days is a bit short unfortunately but I compensate by taking detours. Last year it was 5km and I could do it in about 45 minutes (I walk at a decent pace). I'm not a maniac about it; I'll take public transport if it gets too nasty. And in the summer, walking is kind of a sweaty business so I walk a bit less. But overall, I don't use public transport a lot. A few times per month maybe.
I just remember how beneficial the 20 minute ride/walk to and from the office was for me.
I found that you get linear returns with longer rides. I rode my bicycle for weeks and my motorcycle for months. All day every day across countries. I returned from those trips with an unmatched sense of clarity. I got to process every thought uninterrupted, if necessary for days on end.
I am not sure if meditation is my thing, but that’s as close as it gets.
But so much of urban design and rural infrastructure is car-centric. Sometimes it feels like malicious design, a dark pattern to force people to become dependent on owning automobiles as a necessity for daily living.
Imagine if you went for a 10-minute drive instead of a walk.. It would be an entirely different and worse experience.
I tend to default to DT for any open-ended/creative problem. Write it down in Apple Notes, let it simmer on the back burner for a while and add ideas as they come.
Inc is one step above 'obvious AI generated drivel' for me. It's literally just regurgitated popscience and 20 links to either other Inc articles or to 3rd party popscience sites.
Anecdata: I need fresh air and strongly prefer to keep windows open in most kinds of weather. My wife and my children, now all adults, picked up the habit. Our houses are usually kind of dusty.
Otherwise walking makes the blood flowing again, we did not optimize evolutionary for sitting all day.
This reminds of a strategy I use when having difficulty recalling something like a name or concept: stop trying to remember and do something else for awhile and later the name or concept will typically pop up without concerted effort.
― Søren Kierkegaard
They found that programmers spend 7% of their day walking. The authors of the book were jumping all over that--why, you'd get 7% more output if the programmers just sat down and did their jobs......
Even my other non-work activities after suffered because I am mentally numb at the end of the day. My health is noticeably poorer.
I used to go to the time gym a few times a week but as I got older gym life always is like a 20-something bar dating scene it felt alien and annoying to me.
I have gone for a few bike rides on the weekends and that alone has helped I can feel it. But overall I'm am not even maintaining my health over the year. Summertime I can be active outside and weekends but the winter is the worst for no activity and more calories.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aB_4YU6UtCw
tldr: There is a background, non-verbal process in your brain that has the advantage of a larger working set size than your foreground verbal thinking. It is able to observe and consider more stuff at once and find associations better than your conscious thought process. But, it has several disadvantages. It takes time to do it's processing. You can't will it into action. It communicates non-verbally with your foreground process. It doesn't work under pressure (thus the need for relaxed, unfocused time). The non-verbal understanding is difficult to deconstruct, generalize and reapply. It can lead to you solving a problem, not understanding how and not being able to solve a variant of the same problem.
So, the general recommendation is: If you have a complex problem to solve, first absorb as much information about the problem as your brain can hold. But, do not try to solve anything. Then, go take a break. A walk in a natural environment is preferable. Don’t think about the problem. Relax in a low stress environment. Let your background brain have a chance to chew on it and maybe bubble up some suggestions.
This is all
Did Jobs actually invent any of the user interface or user experience concepts or marketing? Is the idea of making a high quality or perceived high quality product something that requires a stroke of genius?
I'm not saying he didn't achieve some things. Just questioning whether there was truly a lot of creativity or problem solving.
I guess this goes back to my suspicion of management in general. Because executives have the luxury of taking walks from their desks whenever they feel inclined. And they don't really have to finalize any complex solutions themselves. They can get bored of sitting at their desk doing actual work after ten minutes, go out for a nice walk in the corporate garden, then come up with a "brilliant" solution which after they complete their leisurely stroll, they hand off to a principal engineer who says "great idea", then after the executive has taken about ten steps, realizes there is a basic flaw in the solution. The engineer would then likely very briefly consider calling the executive back to explain, but realize it would be counterproductive to encourage him because he might double-down on his unworkable idea. Better to just keep working on a real solution and hope the executive forgets or maybe you can put something in somewhat related to placate him.