The blogger claims that the research was ignored without any consideration, but comments points out that the research have been considered, but rejected as pseudoscience.
If they are correct, let’s research this more. If they are not, let’s have a proper refute and be done with it. If their research and methodology are ‘so flawed as not to be worthy of a proper refute’, why does anyone publish their papers and why aren’t they promptly thrown out of their respective academic organizations?
meh. I guess I should get back to Pythoneering.