If we could go back in time and have the rust project decide to never implement async, I wonder what rust would look like today. There's a good chance the language & compiler would be much nicer as a result.
If we could go back in time and have the rust project decide to never implement async, I wonder what rust would look like today. There's a good chance the language & compiler would be much nicer as a result.
If withoutboats is right [1], then Rust would never have received the industry backing to be as successful as it is now.
[1]: https://without.boats/blog/why-async-rust/ especially the section "Organizational considerations"
I don't know what you had in mind for "sponsored" but others would disagree and say both C and C++ were "sponsored by AT&T Bell Labs" because the people who created them (Dennis Ritchie, Bjarne Stroustrup) were employees of AT&T. Analogous to Rob Pike, et al. of Go Language being employed/sponsored at Google.
We have hundreds of languages made to please the corporate overlords.
Can't we just have one language that's actually nice to use?
The decision for `async` handed a lot of power to Amazon et al.