I'm not a researcher, but have thought about doing a PhD in the past.
It's probably a lot more nuanced that this. Show progress but don't make it easily accessible. *Hide* something important for yourself. Kind of like modern day "open source".
I'm not a researcher, but have thought about doing a PhD in the past.
It's probably a lot more nuanced that this. Show progress but don't make it easily accessible. *Hide* something important for yourself. Kind of like modern day "open source".
Previously there was a natural gatekeep ing effect that you had to be able to understand and translate to code all the math and equations in the paper and be familiar with the dark knowledge details that everyone in the field knows but isn't spelled out explicitly in the papers. Boring bits like how to exactly preprocess, normalize, clean the data, how to precisely do the evals etc.
Somewhat but a few crucial points are missing for it to be that. For example,
- hire a lot more people (PhD candidates, postdocs) than you have funding to pay till they finish. Keep growing and getting more grants until you get a Nobel prize (or equivalent) or go broke
- fake your data and publish in the top journals/conferences
- don't do any research yourself, just get others to do everything and "coordinate" them. Make sure you get all the credit for the publication. The way to get others to do things is to "collaborate" with them or maybe (promise to) pay them.