And how do you know it's accurate? By your own admission, you don't know enough to understand it via a Google search, how do you know it's not making up cases or interpretations like https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-chatgpt-f...
Don't me wrong, it's not replacing expertise on important legal matters, but really helps in the initiation of solutions, or providing direction towards solutions.
On the simpler stuff, it's still useful. Drafting first templates, etc.
To do the same in Google would be 30 minutes instead of 1 minute in AI.
AI first, Google for focused search, Meat expertise third
Edit: and it's a good thing, too, because I'd never be able to afford getting second legal opinions and I don't have time to verify everything my lawyer tells me.