Management can claim "synergy" and "culture" for reasons. That's fine. But we have to be clear that productivity is being sacrificed for those.
Management can claim "synergy" and "culture" for reasons. That's fine. But we have to be clear that productivity is being sacrificed for those.
Basically the type of synergy/innovation that is typically thought by business that it happens by the water-cooler.
On the other hand, in my experience and observations - just one or two of 2-3 days hackathons (so total of <=6 work days) produced almost an order of magnitude more synergy/innovation than those daily (long) lunches during the rest ~5 years of workdays.
Though sure - some things like initial employee onboarding (or even internal move to different unit/team), trainings/workshops, (semi)annual or quarterly plannings...etc are usually better in person.
Yet I've basically never had any of those at office desk. It was either bigger conference room (or dedicated auditorium/presentation/workshop room), or a meeting/lunch with manager or a (more) senior person with one or two of "newbies".
After initial onboarding (which is usually a week or two of "newbie" not being at desk with the rest of their new team).
All of those things add up to 1-2 days in office per month (including giving talks/training/workshop to "newbies").
Add 1 day for interviewing candidates F2F, and we're up to 2-3 days per month.
Even if you have a hackathon each month ... And the most I've seen was 2-3 days once a quarter, though usually it was 2-3 days per half a year - so nothing close to mythical Google 20% of the time ... We're still talking about at most 4-5 days in office per month.
Collaboratively productive… remains to be understood. We need a collaborative tech breakthrough to push remote productivity forward. AWS Chime is awful and they use it very extensively. MS Teams is awful. Google’s Meet is subpar. Asking for certain work to happen remotely is just not going to be as fruitful as in person.