You don't have long texts on slides, and everything is very distinct. I find it especially helpful, as many setups where one presents can be suboptimal (e.g., bad lighting, obstructed views, warped surface that is projected on, …). Which is where this font shines not only for people with impaired vision, but for everyone.
Writing as I do from inside an organisation where the standard seems to be to communicate through meetings where someone reads out the text on a powerpoint slide, I can say that this is nothing if not optimistic.
Doesn't change my other points through ;)
They are also all ever so slightly out of focus. Or dust on the lens. Or projecting on an orange peel wall instead of a screen.
I’m curious how things have improved in let’s say the last ten years. Still hot garbage?
More brightness/better contrast is probably the more important feature for university applications as it allows you to see stuff better even if we are not in a black-walled darkened cinema space.
Everything in 4k with decent colors and high brightness costs a fortune.
But a DCI conform 4k Laser projector is really a view to behold. If only it wasn't so damn expensive.
Either way most universities only feel compelled to spend money when something breaks. I wish that was different, as it makes my job very stressful at times, especially when multiple things break within a small time span.