You don’t provide any data to support your premise. There’s an intervening 10 years between acceptance into medical school and showing up at a surgery table. Show the connection between MCAT scores and surgery outcomes.
lol, The burden is not on the world to prove that 10 years of med school can turn anyone into a good doctor.
It's on the people that decided to not take in the best students in the first place.
Some of them basically felt burned by the education system that accepted them into undergrad where they performed at bottom of class as they were let in with lowest standards. Then this process repeated as they felt burned by med school again as they were let in with lowest scores. Some of them would assume, these schools let me in hoping i would fail out so their diversity numbers look good, instead i graduated at bottom of my class and jad a terrible experience.
The psychological effect of being at the bottom of your class at an Ivy, vs top of your class at a public state university, is an interesting way to start your career in any field.
if u lower academic metrics to admit racially diverse students, these students will all be in bottom 20% unless university changes other factors.
To prevent bottom 20% from all being racially preffered students, the univ or professor has the choice of either lowering level of education to allow racial students to compete, just give them better scores for being racial, or just let them be the bottom 20% of class because they cant keep up with the other academic merit based students.
Some Ivy professors such as Amy Wax have discussed this, mentioning racially admitted students are always in bottom of class, the current process sets them up to fail rather than pushing them to state school where they might be top of class,racial students have never been in top of her classes, as expected the university is trying to revoke her tenure.
The reason all students at this level look exactly the same is that everyone in the pool at this point has essentially unlimited potential.