Why not run something like 8 x L40's for $4,750 a month from a bare metal provider like latitude.sh? This seems far more cost efficient and flexible.
It says that would cost $6.51/hr and $4752/yr: I think you pay both of those things. I think the first number is the hourly cost, and the second number is the annual commitment. So its $56,246/year if you're running 24x7 + $4,756 = $61,002/year total.
The on demand cost is $9.30/hr and $4,752/mo when paid a year upfront
I think you need to consider: Your competitors (e.g. AWS) generally structure annual commitments as an upfront (or monthly) payment + a reduced cost per hour/minute for the resource being reserved; that's the lens through which most people viewing this page will be thinking. If that is not how you structure annual commitments, then that should be made very clear.
If my first paragraph is correct (and again, the page is still confusing, its not obvious to me that this interpretation is correct): You should list one price, and give a dropdown at the top to change the computation of that price across whatever timeframe the user wants ($/hr, $/day, $/month, etc). That would also free up some space in-line to put a chip that says something like "-15% discount!".
- so you have to add the price of AMD/Intel bare metal servers.
- the price of "Networking" PER TB
- and the "Additional services pricing"
"Bandwidth Pricing is based on the country your server is located. Packages are billed monthly and sold in increments of 10 TB."
So even at the reserved price for a year (365 * 24 * $6.51) you're nowhere near $4,750 per year, it's closer to $60k