BlackOps Plastics (Opaque to the eye, transparent for cameras)
qwonn.com
qwonn.com
It feels as if some sleight of hand is hiding in the way they're explaining it, that they've developed a "material that black & white cameras can see through, BUT THE HUMAN EYE CANNOT". The way I see it (heh), the human idea can't "see through" any material, because seeing is not an active process like that makes it sound.
Some materials block radiation from reaching our eyes, while some do not. Those that don't, appear transparent or translucent.
So, I would assume that this plastic blocks wavelengths that are visible to us, but that b&w video cameras have a slightly wider range of wavelengths where they are sensitive, and the material isn't blocking those.
So now it will become routine for counter-surveillance folks to smash all black plastic objects when sweeping a room? :)
Doing this with a regular (IR filter removed) BW camera and a polythene garbage bag is a standard science-fair demo.
As you get further into the infrared it becomes annoying. lots of things you think of as black, like black anodize and black electrical tape are transparent - so you get reflections and light leaks from things you would never think of.
http://imgur.com/SLGvT,y79tC First image - can you guess which one is diet coke, and which one is water? Second image - I was shining a 940 nm IR LED through my hand, you can see veins.
I can make this more interesting!
So webcams generally always respond to IR light. If you look at the front of your remote with our camera phone and press a button, you will see a bluish whitish light. Well, that seems a little weird at first. The light that's coming out of the LED should be closest to red... Well, when CMOS camera companies make their cameras, they heavily rely on the blocking abilities of the IR filter. They want to get amazing signal to noise ratios for the visible spectrum, and the combination of materials that does this is also absorb IR light as well. They can just use a coverall filter to get rid of the infrared light.
Here's the spectral response for the D200 - http://www.maxmax.com/images/Cameras/Technical/NikonD200_Spe...
We used a variant of it to make the entire "puck" of the Dropcam (http://www.dropcam.com) so that you wouldn't have to see the ugly IR emitters we use for night vision.
Video does pass through our servers for NAT traversal, automated analysis (e.g. for motion/audio event detection), conversion, and (optional) storage. Local streaming when on the same network is "in work" as an optimization. Dropcam employees (including me, the CEO) are restricted from viewing your video by both technical and policy-based measures.
It's likely safer than storing video yourself. A burglar can steal any locally-stored video, and security bugs are even more likely to occur on your home network / devices than with a Dropcam since our software is continuously kept up-to-date (both server-side and OTA updates to cameras).
It's definitely safer than most other IP cameras which encourage you to use dyndns + open a port on your router. With those systems, don't forget to change the default password like 95% of people do, and also hope like hell that they don't have remote scripting vulnerabilities on their 2-year old firmware.
At Dropcam, we are incentivized to make sure you are the only one who can view your video, since you are our customer and we provide a service (not just a one-time sale). The only time we let others view your video is if you explicitly choose to share it.
Hope this helps, and thanks for considering Dropcam!
But as for these guys...
"We have developed a technology to create covert concealment devices out of a material that black & white cameras can see through, BUT THE HUMAN EYE CANNOT!"
I may be wrong, but it seems to me that what they "developed" was a relationship with an injection molding company, whom they asked to use a slightly different, but still common plastic.
If they had a specific type of plastic, it is unlikely they would need to produce the multitude of objects they did. Why on earth would they bother with some of those?
"We have developed a technology to create covert concealment devices out of a material that black & white cameras can see through."
I may be picking semantics here but I'm unclear... have they developed the plastic itself, or developed covert camera containers out of another manufacturer's material? The containers are a great idea in their field but actually having engineered the plastic itself would be even more impressive.
http://www.sensorsinc.com/image_powderswirenlarge.html ... "While a visible camera cannot see through plastics, these same plastics are transparent with the short wave infrared. Goodrich ISR-P cameras can see through plastic to detect the fill level of a product. This capability is extremely helpful in quality control and process control applications."