Hacker News Reader

Comment by gessha | Hacker News Reader

Because names mean a lot in and outside software. Try naming it “ML: The Big Nerd Ranch Guide” or use a O’Reilly/No Starch-style cover and you will get a similar reaction.

View on HN

Let the authors deal with it; it doesn't concern us here.

What i am looking for is a discussion of the contents in the book which they have kindly made available for free (the book is expensive).

PS: I am always very appreciative and thankful of people who make their knowledge/books/software available for free and am sure they would like us to focus on the core contents rather than ancillary issues (which they doubtless are aware of and cleared with publishers).

It very clearly does concern us… hence the thread.

FWIW I’m only familiar with the term “pragmatic programmer” because of the book. I don’t think I’ve ever heard it in any other context.

When I saw the post I thought it was written by the same author.

The point is; "it doesn't have to".

Honestly, I only clicked into this thread because I associated the phrase "The Pragmatic Programmer" with the famous book, and if it's not by the same people, I am less interested in their content specifically because of the "borrowed"(stolen?) term.

All your assumptions/preconceived notions are only keeping you from good Knowledge.

It's possible, however I've already wasted time with a click based on the book title, and based on that I would prefer not to give the authors any more of my time regardless of missing out.

[flagged]

My primary purpose is to use good judgement on choosing where to spend my time. Thus I choose not to read the book, it's not hate, it's judgement. My secondary purpose is to not reward those who use underhanded schemes to get ahead. This may not have been their intention, but it is how I perceive it.

Your logic, perception and judgement are all flawed. You merely looked at a familiar phrase in the title and immediately jumped to a conclusion with negative connotations. That's on you. You have no idea about the book, have read no summary/review of it and hence do not have a clue about it and yet are trying to justify your "judgement"?. The book is published by well-known publishers who would have cleared its title to make sure that there are no legal violations (i.e. underhanded schemes) which could get them into trouble. So on that count also your "judgement" fails.

I am advising you to browse/read the book because we (I and a few others in this thread) have browsed/read the book and found it worthwhile (if you are interested in the domain in the first place, of course).

I have seen some silly arguments in my time but you take the cake on "judging a book by its cover" to a whole new absurd level.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com