Taking someone in shouldn’t happen unless there’s an obvious crime and/or the target had a police record which would suggest they were a threat or were likely to flee instead of coming for an interview the following day.
How? Unlike what the news would have you believe, police don't just start shooting willy nilly in America, and cops in his country do have firearms. Most people who get killed in US SWAT operations do so because they open fire on the cops.
The best example is the Breonna Taylor. The media blatantly lied saying her and her partner were in bed initially. In reality, they announced, and had a pretty complex warrant based off of evidenced gathered from prison communications. Even the Wikipedia page is still biased saying her boyfriend fired a "warning shot" mistaking the police for intruders.
The police did not announce themselves. Breonna and her boyfriend WERE in bed and woken up. Neither Breonna nor her boyfriend committed any crimes - the warrant was based off of out-of-date information.
The warrant should've never been issued, but because it was issued, the police decided to perform a no-knock warrant. That's not just a name, that's literally what they do.
Her boyfriend DID fire a warning shot, as his house was broken into in the middle of the night. Any gun owner would in that situation, you included. Breonna was unfortunately shot and killed while she was in bed (bullets go through walls).
What?! Have you read the warrant?! Dude was literally talking on a prison phone with someone in jail about their drug operation!
https://reason.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Breonna-Taylor...
Officer Tatum has debunked a lot of your claims.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GoOFJF0PpU
I really hate Barnes, but even he did a good analysis on this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xugKbUNUz0
Breonna Taylor was likely involved in the drug operations. There were drugs and money seen ins stakeouts funneling through that very house. Had any drugs or money not been moved out, we would even be having this conversation.
I personally know a woman who did Grubhub/Doordash in Louisville. No one liked delivering to that particular neighborhood. She's a school teacher and said everyone in that city knew how bad that part of town is.
Stop spreading clear and blatant lies!
If all the reputable sources are saying one thing, but fringe conservative minds on YouTube are saying another, it might be time to reconsider the validity of your position.
> likely involved
You're basing this on nothing, and "likely" means nothing to me.
> funneling through that very house
Wrong house, wrong warrant
> Had any drugs or money not been moved out, we would even be having this conversation.
Incorrect. Even if there were criminals present (there weren't), the punishment of crime is due process. Not state sanctioned execution. This is a human rights violation no matter how you cut it or how terrible you want to think the victims are.
And that's really the whole crux and the crux of a lot of issues surrounding police brutality. It doesn't matter if there were drugs in this house at one point. It doesn't matter if Floyd was on fentanyl. It doesn't matter if Floyd really did counterfeit a twenty. It doesn't matter if Daniel Shaver really did have a bb gun.
None of those have a punishment of public execution. Police brutality is brutality regardless of if the victims are criminals or not, and regardless of the criminals' race. Or their neighborhood. Or what your buddies in Louisville think of them.