Free Starlink Internet is coming to all of United's airplanes
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
In most companies, when you don’t book specific seats, the algorithm puts you alongside your children anyway.
Children should have privileges adults don't have. As they aren't full independent adults, it's fair to give them special treatment. Nobody is born an adult, so every person in society will get these benefits at some point of their lives.
At the same time, I don't see why airliners shouldn't be able to charge less for tickets that are truly "we will put you whatever we want irrespective of your needs and wants". Children who need to be by their parents shouldn't buy these tickets, the same way children shouldn't buy adult shoes.
Also, I can't imagine people who end up sitting next to a kid whose parent isn't nearby, or the stewards who have to deal with such children would be happy about the arrangement either.
Although, I wonder if maybe the real reason for this might be to discourage families from flying with them....
People pick the cheapest option possible and then complain that it’s not as good as the other options.
For reference on Singapore Airlines, the cheapest seats don't have free seat selection ($10 SGD I think to choose, but not 100% sure I've never flown with them without a child), but if you fly with a child you do get free seat selection, and I've never once encountered any airline that would not place travelling groups together.
However, it is not always a straightforward solution. You are a family of 4, and the airline allots. you 2 + 2 (middle+aisle on one side, and aisle+middle on the other side) as that is efficient, but you would rather have window+middle+aisle + aisle. Or maybe vice versa.
basically an algorithm may not meet your needs, and while the airline can help adjust, it is an overhead in terms of personnel costs, and also if you decide to pick seats last minute when most of the seats are already allocated.
So it makes sense to pay a lot more for the always United tickets rather than the $10 fee for internet on the flight from some other company that had cheaper tickets?
Given that Starlink is still a relatively low bandwidth service and there would be hundreds of people wanting to stream Netflix etc. I'm guessing the latter might be more likely and perhaps better for those that want/need decent internet.
United Airlines Taps Elon Musk's Starlink for In-Flight Wi-Fi