Can't read the article because of the paywall, so this may/not be related...

Is it fair to say that the real liability here is a dataset mapping protein/molecule structures to outcomes/effects? Hypothetically the govt could always require OpenAI to blur responses with malicious intent. But if the underlying corpus is available, what's stopping a bad actor from training another model to do the same thing?

I guess the question I'm asking here is what risk is unique to their model if not the data it was trained on?