Show HN: Build Your WSL Distro in Docker | Hacker News Reader

Show HN: Build Your WSL Distro in Docker

github.com

48 pointsK0IN11 comments

Open articleView on HN

I love WSL, but I have multiple systems and juggling apt packages is a pain.

So I had this in my head for a long time, that I can just build a rootfs using docker and load it in WSL.

I tried it yesterday, and now I have a CLI tool to build my WSL image using Dockerfiles.

I'm not sure if it helps anyone, but I wanted to share it, just in case.

Cheers.

Could you add this to the README?

I went looking for the "Why?" and couldn't find it, I think others would like to hear this too =)

Best thing I could come up with was "declarative WSL setup like Nix/Fedora Silverblue"

This is awesome! I was just today building a new wsl distro, and I didn’t want it tied to just a version of Linux but rather a project. I had to download a rootfs of Ubuntu and import it, and then spent time installing everything. Ofc I could use a bash script to automate the second part.

So this would have solved my prob: have a dockerfile or image and up an wsl env for it. Given how great wsl is these days (i used to have Linux and Mac as daily drivers, now wsl) I guess this sort of thing will become more and more relevant

Nice tool :) I did something similar in a hackathon some years ago. https://github.com/Rucadi/wsld

It's totally unmaintained and forgotten :D

In general, what I do now to generate WSL images is to docker run a container, and then export it to a .tar, finally, install that tar, is that easy.

However, if I had your tool installed, for sure I would use that for ease of use.

Hei interesting, thanks for sharing.

Also, the idea to do it the other way around WSL -> docker image is really nice.

Very cool, this should help me to be able to separate my different testing environments.

Thanks for sharing!

looks cool! Forgive my ignorance, but what's the adv of this over using Docker on WSL2?

for me, the advantages are:

* In WSL2 I don't need to worry about, ports, mounts and data persistence (I think this is possible in docker but it needs more setup work)

* I don't need docker desktop running

in the end I think that both can solve the problem, I myself prefer wsl for my day to day tasks.

fyi docker works perfectly fine in wsl on Ubuntu and other distro using the standard installation method on Linux, no docker desktop needed.

Thats a pretty nice thing to have!

Thanks for sharing this.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com