Adapter lets you use cheap eSIM plans on any Android phone
androidauthority.com
androidauthority.com
When visiting the US I got a sim that was running on tmobile and gave me 5Gb for $4. However it was obviously using a loophole for a roaming carrier as it claimed I was on a Polish IP, which made Google convert everything to zł.
Except for that (just had to make sure I added "in $" to Google) everything worked perfectly.
Is it seriously $4.99 in the US?
I'd call that an arbitrage opportunity, not a loophole :)
See that for more info and a comparison of the esim adapters.
Interesting point is >Their solution is not the commonly-used Eastcompeace solution. Instead, they used disassembled Apple chips. As you can see in the EasyLPAC screenshot. They used these recycled chips and re-engineered them.
I'd take that with a grain of salt: Desoldering eUICCs from iPhones and somehow fitting them into the Nano SIM form factor sounds prohibitively expensive!
Any chance it's actually old Apple SIMs (i.e. the physical things Apple used to ship in the SIM tray of iPads before they had widespread eSIM support)?
https://shop.sysmocom.de/sysmoEUICC1-eUICC-for-consumer-eSIM...
> While there are other eSIM adapters, the JMP adapter is the only one that doesn’t use a proprietary, closed source app.
https://www.sysmocom.de/manuals/sysmoeuicc-manual.pdf (p. 26)
With most profiles, it'll be more than 5
Is this for real? What is the catch?
[1] https://jmp.chat/faq or see https://jmp.chat/pricing/CAD#CA
> Because we use the Jabber network […]
Wait, what does Jabber have to do with sending texts and making calls on mobile networks?
I am still with Google Fi since I was traveling a lot abroad. But now I am back in the US and see that there are much cheaper plans. Is google fi still worth it?
Some of them literally just resell local SIMs on a different storefront, but that seems to be the absolute minority.
Most of them sell eSIM profiles not "based" in the country you're actually buying data for, which I suspect allows them to effectively provide access to, and often arbitrage of, the rate carriers in the visited country would charge their users directly.
I've experienced all kinds of interesting combinations, such as receiving an ICCID from country A, IMSI and (usually) IP address from country B, while traveling to country C. (In this case, the reseller pays the provider in country B for access to their wholesale roaming rates between the visited network in C and themselves, I assume.)
Some providers actually use Multi-IMSI SIMs under the hood, which is yet another level of virtualization, allowing them to dynamically select a "home" network closer to your visited location, improving latency and the distance your data has to travel. (Truphone, now BetterRoaming, does that, for example.)
It's insane what they are charging.
Is this the life hack to get inexpensive service? I see that people are recommending the xiaomi flip phone, but that's $1000+ on eBay.
Is using an esim an inexpensive way to get phone service if you don't need international roaming? That's handy, but would not be the main reason I would switch.
The cost for these seems pretty high though.
My Chinese / Hong Kong model takes dual nano SIM but no eSIMs
TL;DR: More useful for international travel, less useful for US domestic carriers. There's a few T-Mobile MVNO's that are cheap/free you might be able to use this with.
Sure, they can support the EID flow if they must to support whatever legacy distribution channels, but would it kill them to also support the QR-based eSIM flow like literally every other country in the world?