There are still lots of underground nooks and crannies of the internet today, arguably more than ever. It's what you make of it, and where you choose to spend your time.
There are still lots of underground nooks and crannies of the internet today, arguably more than ever. It's what you make of it, and where you choose to spend your time.
I would. Having the answer handed to you doesn't actually teach you much. It's the struggle to figure out the answer that makes it stick. The kids today who can just get easy answers from AI aren't going to have anywhere near the skills we do.
Today I can quickly be productive in unfamiliar domains, and learn while asking questions to an AI that is available 24/7, and and has an extremely deep knowledge of so many things. Personally even as an experienced programmer I have learned so much in the last year, greatly accelerated by AI.
Kids are going to be better off for it, and with it will achieve incredible things.
Today, you can quickly get a shallow, superficial understanding of the domain that might impress some people who know barely anything about the respective domain.
> and learn while asking questions to an AI that [...] has an extremely deep knowledge of so many things.
ROFL
Bullshit. I've seen blind idiots kids pasting Solaris commands into Linux servers, without having any clue of what were they doing.
Kids are going to be really screwed when the AI output converges into more Markov-chains like bullshit as it's being self-feeding with it's own output, creating something like a big but pompous Megahal/Hailo clone.
If any, we the older Millenials are trained to do hard tasks with just the manuals sitting on a table. The rest will be clueless.
This isn't going to happen. The literature on model collapse suggests it occurs when your model is fed on majority synthetic data, which is not how anyone is training models. Even if they were, do you think they're going to ship something that performs noticeably worse than its predecessor?
Because the end users will use far more the output data from AI than feeding it from remote sources far from the original.
Disasters will happen, just wait.
This happens all the time. Once the first gen devs are off, the releases tend to alternate. A decline from the existing version and then an improvement that mostly fixes what they made worse in the prior release. e.g. Windows XP -> Vista -> 7 -> 8 -> 10
The nature of AI though may make it more difficult to distinguish the failings immediately which could result in an irreversible inflection point.
Yes. Capitalist software vendors do that all the time. Google search has been getting continually worse over the decades. Windows is more bloated than ever. AI is going to be no different.
Not as glamorous as before but there are still players every day. http://tastyspleen.net/quake/servers/list.cgi
There is something to be said about doing things "the hard way" and I think AI is, in the short term, going to decrease the amount of medium-skilled software developers out there.
I'll take present-day Ubuntu any day. I install it on my desktop, and it just works, GPU and all. I install it on my weird laptop with a touchscreen that swivels 360 degrees and can rotate to a portrait desktop, and it also just works.