Counter-Strike 2 gaming using Neuralink is 'insane'
tomshardware.com
tomshardware.com
Well, I'd say permanent brain damage from scaring alone wouldn't quite be worth an extra 1 click per second...
What it's showing really is a very different problem; the mouse is a fair show and inefficient input method. While some use-cases, like 2d/2d panning, drawing, etc., benefit from a pointing device, most of the typical UI can best be done by a keyboard. I doubt any brain computer interface can achieve 100+ WPM on arbitrary inputs with a low error rate.
The exponential growth is that you see nothing for long time, until it is too late.
Once you blinked you will find the HN site is full of articles about the minimal-invasive brain microsurgery startups getting funded billions of dollars. And that we are in the midst of another tech bubble.
I think Neuralink is going to be more like SpaceX, not like Bitcoin.
I'm not ready to declare exponential growth in anything but hype levels, yet; I don't see any great leaps forward concerning the fundamental problems faced by the field.
I also think it's insane having Elon's m̶o̶n̶k̶e̶y̶s̶ surgeons poking at your brain, but maybe that's just me.
BTW, the video show him playing with and against BOTS (that are notoriously weak in CS2), not with/against other human players (where he would stand no chance - and no fun - even against beginning players)
https://insights.greyb.com/neuralink-patents/ https://founderslegal.com/interesting-patents-a-leap-into-th...
Conventional wires and biopolymers is just not good enough for this to go above guinea pig tech.
6 globally and nothing revolutionary regarding the scaring problem. can read all the data of the brain is cool, but nobody will integrate that,if all you get is a useless socket on your skull.