Australia to Impose National Age Limits on Social Media Websites
bloomberg.com
bloomberg.com
Social media ban for children to be introduced this year, but age limit undetermined
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has vowed to introduce a bill to ban children from social media this year.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-09-09/government-plans-soci...Some way to go, if at all. A Bill needs to be written, voted on, passed into Law and implemented .. all steps with hurdles.
> myGovID is the Australian Government’s Digital ID app which allows you to prove who you are when accessing government online services. You can choose to connect your myGovID to your myGov account.
Because parents are not equipped to defend their children at scale from the threat actors mentioned. Again, high support of these measures from the public. You’re blaming parents for the digital equivalent of tobacco and alcohol. Victim blaming has no place here.
Already in production in China. Well beyond anything Orwell wrote about. Scary to see these apparent stepping stones to totalitarianism in the west.
The public support is for an age limit of social media (which already exists), not necessarily the measures to achieve it which are yet to be determined. There's not 68% support of using measures like digital ID.
It's not always black and white. Pretty much every parent I know, is against their kid using phones at school. And yet, as most kids have phones already, they end up buying one for their kids too. I will inevitably do too. Of course you can take a hard stance and not doing it - but the social isolation your kid would risk, could end up worse.
I'm getting increasingly disillusioned by the whole idea of 'freedom' on the internet. That worked well until big companies and states figured out how to take advantage of it - for profit & influence. And then invested billions with very specific objectives - how to make you addicted to it, and how to influence your thoughts.
It's an unfair game.
Yes, that sounds like inadequate parenting.
The answer doesn't seem to be show-me-your-papers in order to access websites.
This parental responsibility is not be to outsourced to quasi-government surveillance entities with unclear private interests and security practices.
This makes sense. Social media is much less harmful over wifi vs cellular data or when viewed through a tablet form factor mobile app vs phone form factor mobile app
Calling handing a child a 6” screen “inadequate parenting” and calling handing a child a 9” screen “adequate parenting” is rational because 9 is 6 upside down, which everyone knows means that it’s the opposite
I've raised two girls to adulthood (now in their mid-20s). When they were at high school, it was a mandatory requirement for them to have laptops (from year 8/9 onwards). (I'm not wanting to kick off a discussion about schooling and the efficacy or not of various tech).
Highly complex problems with lots of nuanced issues are not amenable to trivially simple and seductively satisfying solutions.
If you circulate and promote defamatory or harmful material, you should be held accountable.
No more free pass for social media.