Yes but the exhaustion was not 100% organic. There was a bit of social engineering towards wearing the maintainer down even further.

I'm just pointing it out because I think it's going to be a tricky balance to strike. How can we, as a community of people who care about free and/or open source software tell the difference between:

- a good faith effort to inform the wider community of a maintainer who is behaving badly

- a bad-faith contributor pressuring an overworked maintainer to include a malicious commit

I think you're the former, but I'm rather worried about the latter. And I'm interested in strategies for telling the two apart.