It’s interesting comparing the comments here to Twitter where there’s been a lot of discussion about the ethics of this (as in she shouldn’t have done this for some ethical reason that is never quite elucidated in detail, other than it’s wrong to do).

In contrast, many comments here are talking about the ethics of not having this approach more broadly available, which is fairly optimistic for Hacker News.

Or maybe it’s just that a subsection of bio-ethicists on Twitter have oddly shaped moral values.