Five Geek Social Fallacies (2003)
plausiblydeniable.com
plausiblydeniable.com
This is a very interesting list of social assumptions that many people hold or have held but often don't hold up, and it's good to think about them.
But they're not universal among "geeks" nor rare among people who are not geeks, so the narrow framing and the armchair psychoanalyzing within that framing distract from the real insights.
Perhaps I had to learn my lessons the hard way regardless
I find it hard to accept it's social fallacy. I can see the others though, so I'll take it seriously and work to a point where I can at least understand the perspective. The why this is a fallacy isn't really explained. I do get that if it is perceived as a fallacy that certain requests are in appropriate
Five Geek Social Fallacies (2003) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30120733 - Jan 2022 (4 comments)
One thing I’ve personally noticed is that traumatized people have cognitive distortions which go beyond simply social awkwardness. There are physiological changes which may help explain such behavior https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6428430/
There is an assumption here that geeks respond better to scientific-formatted articles.