Well, for starters, you just `s/<regex>/<replacement>/` and try to use that in your everyday work. Just forget about the syntax. It's a search-and-replace tool.
That's the only way I used sed for years. I've learned more since then, but it's still the command I use the most. And that's also what `sd` focuses on.
Also, if you want to replace newlines, just use `tr`, to hook onto the examples of sd. It may seem annoying to use a different tool, but there are two major advantages: 1. you're learning about the existence, capabilities and limitations of more tools 2. both `sed` and `tr` are probably available in your next shitty embedded busybox-driven device, while `sd` probably is not
As you said, the value comes from being around for a long time and, probably more importantly, still being present on nearly any Unix-like system.
Earlier I did this
cat as1 | grep " 65" | sed -e 's/.* 0 65/65/' -e 's/[^ 0-9]//' |sort|uniq
Now some twat will come along and say my process should have been cat as1
grep " 65" as1
grep " 65" as1 | sed -e (various different tries to the data looks useful)
grep " 65" as1 | sed -e (options) | sort|uniq
Because otherwise it's a "useless use of cat" and reformatting my line is well worth the time and cognitive load to save those extra forks.