Hacker News Reader

Did you miss quote the OP?

Not quoting OP directly, just commenting on the oft-used trope ('the votes were bought!') used to attack the measure's legitimacy.

Why do you think they spent $200M?

Good point. Whether $200M bought any votes, it's telling that corporate CA thought it was worth that.

Can you explain why that isn't a good point? I assume companies don't spend $200 million for something that won't be in their benefit