Yes, but the author uses the same name with no caveats. E.g. "But if psychiatry’s medical vision is failing TIs like Luca, what should we replace it with?"
I see what you mean and was slightly confused when reading the article as well. The author uses the word probably to take the middle stance, acknowledging those who have it and read the article without discrediting their worldview, when the medical community has already failed them, but still describing what may not line up with reality