> It treats people with money problems as fellow citizens rather than science projects. It empowers them to make their own decisions.
Maybe they are in trouble because they make poor decisions.
> It treats people with money problems as fellow citizens rather than science projects. It empowers them to make their own decisions.
Maybe they are in trouble because they make poor decisions.
Your last phrase irked me quite to the point of ignoring the rest. While there are of course poor decision makers among poor, I believe just blaming them does zero helping the society - and I hope for a society where I can walk on the streets without being attacked by starving "poor decision makers". And no, living between barbed wire walls is not a future I like either.
>> Why would paying off medical debt help any of them? They already received the service, it can't be repossessed. It's not as if their medical credit was maxxed out and until it was paid down they couldn't do another ER visit.
> A great many medical care providers won't continue to treat patients who don't pay their bills
For the people we're talking about, they won't treat them at all without some proof that they're able to pay, and in some cases, payment up front. Paying down bills won't get these people further medical treatment. It's like you're confused, but I'm having difficulty figuring out where.