I'm not sure what his problem was or what exactly the meds were, and I still think psychology is mostly bull, but I do have some respect for psychiatric pharmaceuticals and their benefits now.
I rather advocate for a healthcare system that attempts to help the patient, where and how it is necessary, to the patient's best achievable benefit. Sometimes that might be medication, sometimes it might be telling them that there's nothing wrong with them and society just doesn't know how to deal with them.
And let's not kid ourselves. A good amount of society at large is a very poor fit for a good amount of people, and should probably change too.
Someone even fancying the idea that somebody "anti-authoritarian" is mentally ill can immediately be classified as a totalitarian cracknut.
And, at least when they called it electroshock everybody knew it was Russian roulette with the prize being a vegetable.
If a person complains too much, or becomes a nuisance to society, or disruptive, then they are penalized and sentenced to a "virtual incarceration" by means of drugs and clinical monitoring.
Psychiatric drugs were explicitly developed as a replacement for confinement and physical restraints. The asylum system was shut down deliberately once the technology was in place to turn them out on the streets.
All those homeless you see today are actually imprisoned and being punished. The apparatus is simply invisible to you.