Texas State Police Gear Up for Expansion of Surveillance Tech
texasobserver.org
texasobserver.org
It's these type of examples that show just how bad tracking and data harvesting is being used beyond the described use by whatever is doing the hoovering of data. The fact this is something that can be sold is beyond ridiculous. If you collect it for internal use is totally different from collecting for the explicit purpose of selling to others.
In theory it could be different, in practice it simply isn't. If we want any kind of privacy law, "internal use" or "legitimate interest" or whatever nonsense the data brokers deploy to pretend there's some way to do this that isn't unethical is a smokescreen and a loophole in every context, and we should ban the harvesting of that data regardless of its intended use
I also expect to see a shift to buying more "data-driven insights" from big data aggregators, which in practice will mean the same thing as buying the data means now, just with the middlemen rearranged slightly
Governments will still be able to subpeona the data in ways that route around human rights and on the rare occasions where this comes to light, "national security" and the need to fight whatever war - whether against a concrete nation or organization or an abstract concept - they believe will most muddy the waters to cite
Actually, the regulatory language is easy. "You may not buy or sell user data."
The friction comes from the fact that a large part of our economy is highly dependent on the ability to buy and sell user data.
But as you note.. surveillance economy will not be happy about it and likely fight back.
Amusingly, the people who understand the risks and take precautions are also least likely to put a spotlight on them, which privacy-conscious tend to avoid.
This is only a recent part of the economy that the world would not collapse if we went back to a time of it not being part of the economy. Just because something is does not mean that it should. There are plenty of historical example of where something was that was not right that took time so that eventually what is is now no more.
But I don't believe that the existence of black markets means we shouldn't regulate legal markets. Even if it's true that bad actors would try to find new ways to exploit data as regulations change, this doesn't negate the value of regulation entirely. Lots of industries face similar challenges (e.g. financial regulation, environmental protection) yet still benefit from regulatory frameworks.
Furthermore, the existence of loopholes is an argument for crafting more robust and adaptable regulations, and knowledgeable bodies to govern them--not for abandoning regulation altogether.
I believe the easy workaround is to designate the other party a "data processor" or something of that sort.
"We're not selling data, we merely allow partners to access it to generate reports for us."
So somewhat possible?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=q1p94mLE3Aw
Mass surveillance is used to kill journalists and politicians.
https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/mexico-councilwoman-k...
You quickly become the weakest link.
I do think the Russian response is quite a bit of projection, because they know what they would do to get the keys to Telegram's kingdom. It's interesting though that I haven't heard Elon opine on how weak Telegram's end-end security is since the arrest. You'd think he would warn everyone to avoid it?
The fact that the walled garden isn't preventing this type of behavior is pretty good evidence of why it's no where near as safe as they tout it.
Thanks Apple for keeping the App Store safe!
Maybe astrology apps fit under "lifestyle" which is #2. It's much more widespread than we think.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/12/20/opinion/locat...
They just install one of these scummy apps and click OK to it vacuuming up all their contacts, which includes everything they know about you.
What am I missing?
Plus, IMEI numbers can be used by carriers, and that is a very solid identifier per phone. When you operate at that level, tracking is very easy. ATT has been selling this data for years
- malware on phones (even though apps are supposed to only get anonymous information, there are ways to workaround it. For one a app can just ask your name and many people will put it in.)
- cell phone companies selling the data (see for evidence they do this https://www.vice.com/en/article/i-gave-a-bounty-hunter-300-d...)
Bear in mind these companies advertising a capability doesn't mean it works on every target.
Clearly iOS was providing the app with some API to query my current phone number, and was disclosing it without my explicit consent.
Also phones don't meaningfully actually interfere with modern avionics. If your safety on the flight actually depended on hundreds of people clicking a button consistently every time the majority of planes wouldn't make it.
I often walk out of home with an old iPhone which doesn't have a SIM card and it does everything that I need it to.
The only thing that doesn't work is browsing the Internet or Messaging.
I guess if you really don’t want to be found, put your phone on airplane mode or get a burner.
Collect data for a few days to learn schedules, throw in some more specific data purchased from ISPs, other fingerprints, plot it on top of an actual map with roads and buildings, and you’ve got a very good guess of where specific people are, where they live and work, and how they move around.
Correlate that with other people’s data and eventually you’ll be able to guess who they live and hang with.
I was expecting some big scary number or software, but it's pretty boring technology and contract.
It'd be healthy if they just ceceded. Kind of like the a reverse Taiwan situation. Sorry Chip and JoJo, I think you're about to slip off the USA map, nit that the rest is much better.
Texas is one of the worst for human rights to the point where I wouldn't even drive through. They had to make a law that their police have to stop searching drivers buttholes without cause and yet they keep getting sued for doing random cavity searches. The last run through my parents got the third degree with implication that they might be immigrants. My fathers roots are in England/Scotland and both families have lived here for longer than the US has been the US.
It is the among the worst for reproductive rights with lawmakers wanting to punish women for abortions obtained in other states, punish women who even drive through anti abortion counties on their way to leave the state, and let any interested party including woman's rapists collect a bounty on the head of their victim in a brazen attempt to avoid getting the law thrown out.
Because of this and other factors its drastically short of doctors having almost the worst ratio of doctors to patients in the US
https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/rankings-and-ratings/s...
It has more people without health insurance than any other state and its getting worse in recent years.
https://www.census.gov/library/visualizations/interactive/pe...
It is among the worst for law and order. It's AG is a criminal several times over.
https://apnews.com/article/paxton-indictment-texas-d5e57fc6c...
It allows a certain county judge selected by Trump handle all the most insanely biased cases that nobody in their right mind would take handing out rulings binding citizens in other states. These cases are so ridiculous that the 6v3 conservative Supreme Court has to keep stepping in to put down this court's militantly stupid decisions.
It is among the worst for democracy. It is working to try to pass a law that all statewide offices would have to be held by candidates who won the majority of the majority of its counties not its population. For reference Texas has 256 counties some with as few as a few dozen people and the majority of the majority could constitute as little as 4% of its population. It wants to enshrine rural republican rule at the expense of anything else.
It filed a lawsuit last go round asking the surpreme court to literally throw out everyone's votes and essentially appoint Trump President.
https://www.texastribune.org/2020/12/11/texas-lawsuit-suprem...
Despite being hard on crime its murder rate is slightly higher than average while its incarceration level is much higher than average.
https://www.sentencingproject.org/research/us-criminal-justi... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_intentional_homicide_rate
No problem there unless you like being the ruler from afar. Perhaps a good solution would be to split governance so that urban and rural populations stay separate.
Until the West Coast states are safe to be openly anywhere right of center, I’ll take rural Texas or Fort Worth for good or ill.
As described the majority of the the majority is literally four single digit four percent of the electorate. The obvious intent is that at present the majorities views align with the minority and it should change the rules such as to prevent usurpation even should they lose the popular mandate.
It presages a future Texas where the majority of Texans want to move forward and the way is barred for a generation.
It is exactly by proportion as if we should decide that the only people who are allowed to hold nationwide office is someone who wins Minnesota no matter how the vote goes elsewhere. It's a world in which Walter Mondale wins Minnesota and we declare him president despite losing every other state to Reagan.
Then someone pops up and defends Minnisotism somehow as preventing the subjugation of Minnesota.
It's pretty safe... I live in Portland and am not shy about telling people I think that social security and the Wagner Act and OSHA are all unconstitutional, and that I think government should never provide welfare, and nothing bad has happened to me. In fact earlier this year I requested trial by combat from the Portland taxiation office, both on the phone and in a written letter, such that my victory could exclude me from paying Supportive Housing taxes; the only outcome was the lady on the phone laughed at me.
Furthermore demographic changes suggest that the majority will be in some decades in accord with the rest of us if we don't blink now.
More importantly it would create a legal precedent that if allowed would fracture the US utterly diminishing our global power and likely leading to long term conflict which we may lose.
Anyone want to see civil war v2 with the new Confederacy aligned with China and Russia?
Conflict with China and Russia seems increasingly likely already in the long run and as China's star rises they have less reason for restaint.
Traditionally the rising star wars with the existing powers when supremacy is in doubt and that would very much be the case if we split in 2 or 3 and allegiance to eachother were in doubt.
There is every reason to believe that the US will defeat the fascist threat presented by Trump and come through it whole. If we allow seccession we will instead likely see the US split into the US and Trumpistan with TX only the first domino to fall. Doubtless other red states would follow probably into a loose confederation of states itself in danger of splintering further.
The best case would be ending up the EU with major economic ties preventing conflict between China and Russias aspirations crushed in Ukraine.
This is however a massive dice roll with no guarantee that it goes so well especially for women, liberals, and minorities in the red states.
remember our much-maligned "disconnected" grid when you think you are turning the lights out on us
It'd be expedient. An entire generation of people have had such bad experiences in politics they've apparently just entirely given up on them and then have mistaken their position for one of rationale.
It'd be healthy if we fixed whatever caused this type of banter to be accepted.
TX lege been very friendly towards Israel government. Israeli government also has tight controls over who has access to their tech (ie, no sales to non friendly entities).
In wake of Roe v Wade repeal, TX “trigger law” on abortion, and Project 2025. We all know this is really going to be used to track “abortion traffickers”. Let’s hope this election doesn’t go that way though.
Next phone will have GrapheneOS or e/os. But that is just me. Seems like most people don not know about all this or are so locked into to a platform it is impossible to get them to change.
The Government is so controlled by corporations we cannot depend on the politicians either.
Might be time to just sit back and watch.
Ah. A scam.