Tsickle and the like seem to be archived as well, so it's unclear to me. Google must internally have some tooling to go from ts to closureJS?
Tsickle and the like seem to be archived as well, so it's unclear to me. Google must internally have some tooling to go from ts to closureJS?
It is so, so good!
You have to take care to write code in a certain way, but once you understand the constrants it's not a big deal. The advanced optimizations are better than anything else I've seen in the JS world, and it's not even close. It's just insanely good.
What an amazing project, well done!
Lucid Software migrated their code from closure compiler JS to typescript, and continue to use the closure compiler with advanced optimizations. See https://lucid.co/techblog/2017/11/16/converting-600k-lines-t....
It would not at all surprise me if google internally has better tooling than what they have open sourced though.
I imagine it's lacking a lot of typescripts newer features etc. seems hard to justify using it
But then again my introduction to JS was Douglas Crockford's JavaScript: The Good Parts and I write a lot of C++ so I'm always content with the idea of using only a subset of the language.
[1]: https://techcrunch.com/2024/05/01/google-lays-off-staff-from...