Appeals court revives TikTok 'blackout challenge' death suit

"In short, you can't have it both ways: Either you serve everything, let users sort it out and keep that liability shield; or you make algorithmic picks that surface content, give users what you think they want and take on the liability that comes with being the arbiter of that content."

Then again, is this not what a search engine does?

Then again, the search engine shouldn't have personalized results.

But some people want personalized results.

But children are not old enough to understand the consequences.

I'd also note that it's a company controlled by an USA competitor (China) that gets hammered first (?) by an USA court. I wonder if USA platforms benefited from self-censorship by the courts ?

See also how, while theoretically USA infocoms have been made illegal in the EU nearly a decade ago (with the US state violating human rights and these infocoms being forced to help them), that ban still hasn't been enforced, partially because the relationships between the USA and the EU has mostly still been pretty good - instead we have seen a bunch of other laws pop up in the EU and screws being tightened only slowly and meekly.