DisplayPort is superior in every other way imaginable. Except for the fact that almost no TV supports it.
Low-end monitors also don't usually have them, but as far as computer monitors go, I'm not interested in the low-end ones.
As for TVs - just give me a dumb screen with ports. I'm going to attach Apple TV to it anyway.
No device output in DP, no device accepts it, so no pressure on device to accept/output it. I guess the license price is low enough.
On computers, it sort of evolved where DVI was, you get mort port, you get better feature set, it's just superior.
But in the non-tech market I think the "real" fight will end up being hdmi vs usb-c, both of them are evolving to the point where they feed everything ethernet included. HDMI has ARC and waayyyy simpler cable and port compatibility (one version to check), usb-c has power output and every single pocket device and laptop/tablet/...
Yeah, if we exclude basically every half decent GPU and ~70% of laptop USB-C ports in existence.
The laptop's spec page doesn't say what refresh rates are supported for external displays (except saying at least 60Hz): https://support.apple.com/en-us/111901
I'll buy a new cable right now :)
HDMI ethernet and HDMI eArc use the same pins. eArc won, HDMI ethernet is pretty much dead.
So frustrating. I'm using a 42" LG OLED TV as a monitor right now. Very nice monitor at half the price of the same panel in a "real" monitor. I'm driving it with an AMD card at 60 Hz for exceedingly stupid reasons.
To make things even worse, this monitor supports sending back the ARC audio over DisplayPort, but only in stereo. If I use HDMI between the monitor and the computer, I get all of audio channels.