1. "Smack my bitch up" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eU5Dn-WaElI
2. "Voodoo people" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZYLp5uX9Yw
Those pieces sound exactly the same as the original, but it does not violate copyright because they've been produced by hand. Mind blowing!
Anyway I'm definitely not a copyright expert but I just found this argument extremely weak.
Similarly, I can't draw a batman cartoon with pencil and paper and avoid copyright claims when I try to sell the episodes.
Please do not go around infringing on copyright and thinking it's OK because you recreated whatever it was by hand.
Jim Pavloff was never sued by Prodigy or the right owners.
On the other hand:
https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/case-study/blurred-lines-...
> Marvin Gaye’s Estate won a lawsuit against Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams for the hit song “Blurred Lines,” which had a similar feel to one of his songs
Which refutes your assertion of no potential copyright violation.
B. They don't sound exactly the same as the original.
C. That they were produced by hand or automation is irrelevant.