You don't get to make a false claim and then handwave it away. You made the claim and you were given evidence otherwise.
This was not a case of a user confusing encryption in transit, as you claim.
This was not a case of a user confusing encryption in transit, as you claim.
Do not use Telegram.
> As another HN user pointed out Telegram does not store messages in plaintext: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41348228
Telegram does not store messages in plaintext.
Your claim:
> That user seems to be misinformed, and appears to be discussing client-server encryption, not end-to-end encryption
Is categorically false. You do not get to redefine what encryption is. That is not your right.
You've been corrected repeatedly. If you continue to insist you have not made a false claim, you are then lying.