There is only one amphibian emoji
wonger.dev
wonger.dev
On Apple platforms, at least, all the crustaceans mentioned are red and therefore look very much cooked.
Otherwise you are risking serious illness. From either pathogens of marine origin or later handling.
Crab: parasitic flukes (liver flukes and lung flukes), roundworms (e.g. Angiostrongylus cantonensis) and tapeworms (e.g. Diphyllobothrium spp.). Viruses: norovirus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus.
Lobsters: Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio vulnificus, Vibrio cholera.
Shrimp and Squid: many of the same.
Sources:
- https://seafoodbysykes.com/guide-to-eating-squid/
- https://www.cfs.gov.hk/english/multimedia/multimedia_pub/mul...
- https://www.vinmec.com/eng/article/is-it-safe-to-eat-raw-shr...
Emojis are really great.
Emoji are entirely ideograms.
Or the skull emoji which has a variety of meanings relating to being metaphorically dead - “I’m dying from laughing”, “you’re fucked”, etc.
There’s also the controversy over the acceptability or not of using the sobbing emoji to represent laughter.
> Sometimes people will simply use the corn emoji in place of the word 'porn', too.
https://www.capitalfm.com/internet/corn-meaning-porn-explain...
Similarly rooster emoji (cock) and cat emoji (pussy) have language dependent double meanings.
We communicate with much more than language (autistic persons excluded, as they can be blind to social cues) and many messages are open to multiple interpretations. Emojis help frame the context, which would otherwise be framed by inflexion, tone, subtle movements of tens facial muscles.
It is adaptation instead of regression really.
2) Evolution is a biological process term, and an overloaded and ambiguous one at that. Culture is accretive and driven by social dynamics. “Cultural evolution” is literally nonsensical. This was, however, a popular way of thinking in the nineteenth century; make of that what you will.
3) kids these days amirite?
Calling things racist isn't a valid argument. Meme theory is from the 20th century, not the 19th.
I think you might be confusing the modern understanding of cultural evolution with the 19th century (to put it plainly: racist) idea of social Darwinism. Cultural evolution is a much more recent concept that makes an analogy between the modern understanding of the transmission of genes and the transmission of ideas. The analogy is of course imperfect, but by no means "literally nonsensical". See here for a very comprehensive discussion: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evolution-cultural/
I see nothing in cultural memetic theorizing (which I summarized as “culture is accretive and driven by social dynamics”) that supports that.
The term “cultural evolution” is highly unfortunate as it is one more example of humanities folk borrowing science terminology in a bid to coin some evocative word salad that will sound relevant and scientific.
Citation needed. I think you might prove that by expressing those three sentences in pictograms, so that we can verify whether they convey "way more meaning". I have my doubts.
Because amphibians are essentially made up of frogs/toads, salamanders, and caecilian.
People like frogs, it is an important emoji to have.
Salamanders on a small scale look too similar to a lizard.
Caecilians on a small scale look too similar to worms or snakes.
So the only reasonable amphibian to have an emoji is a frog.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFkIG9S2Mmg - The Insane Biology of: The Axolotl
You’d think the Unicode consortium would know better. Dinosaurs are also miscategorized as reptilian but I can understand the mistake, because dinosaurs are extinct.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peluda https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarasque
Your knowledge of the biology of fictional creatures certainly is astounding-
Birds (Aves) are dinosaurs (Dinosauria), and dinosaurs are reptiles (Reptilia).
Much later, during the Middle Ages, "dragon" began to be used for translating the names of many kinds of animals, usually of the winged type, from the mythologies of various countries.
In order to identify the many kinds of "dragon" animals, in each case one would have to trace the origin of the story, which was the original language of the story, which was the original word that has been translated as "dragon", and which was the description of that animal, e.g. with or without wings, with fur or with feathers or with scales, with or without feet and so on.
I just imagine that the dragon is too overweight to fly, and that scorpions are easy to squish if you have sturdy construction boots.
I'm happy to hear better groupings!
[0] https://juniperpublishers.com/ofoaj/OFOAJ.MS.ID.555850.php
List of all proposals: https://www.unicode.org/emoji/emoji-proposals-status.html
Tho the dromedary is the one used for the camel cigarettes, which is confusing.
(It's an odd meme)
you don't need to be pro LGBT to agree with the logic lol: 29 clock emojis, 2 sexual/gender flags
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dart+frog+gallery&t=newext&atb=v42...