"Samsung Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch"
Ads might mention mention Android but much more verbiage is about the device features and the like.
iPhone doesn't need this. RIM really didn't need this.
Windows Phone adds I have heard, Nokias are now known for running Windows Phone, I haven't heard many commercials for other device manufacturers. But, for me, I know it is an Android phone when I hear the ridiculous names.
"Samsung Galaxy S II Epic Touch 4G Android Phone, Black (Sprint)"
http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-Galaxy-Epic-Touch-Android/dp/B...
Wow.
Do you really imagine that the hundreds of millions of Android users chose "anything but Apple"?
This mirrors the iPad discussion. People want a device to fill needs. Anyone who thinks this isn't competition with the iPhone is an imbecile.
Do you really imagine that the hundreds of millions of Android users chose "anything but Apple"?
Yes I believe this is true.There are very few redeeming qualities that an Android tablet has over an iPad. Likewise the people I know with Android phones either couldn't afford an iPhone, don't want one due to philosophical issues, or just wanted a simple feature-less cell phone and an Android phone was the same price.
People do not desire Android devices... they tolerate them. That's why Google should be afraid of these new Microsoft tablets and phones -- people already desire them in a way I have never heard anyone talk about any android device ever created in the past 3 years.
They choose a phone based upon that. Hundreds of millions of people, when given that choice, choose an Android device for a wide variety of reasons. You don't get that, I understand, because you live in a bubble and have no engagement with the real world.