Mark Zuckerberg Says White House Was 'Wrong' to Pressure Facebook on Covid
wsj.com
wsj.com
Also, outrageous, conspiracy-oriented, and rage-bait content has much higher engagement anyway, which is why their algorithm has historically encouraged it so heavily. Explicit misinformation falls into those categories and has been good for their bottom line and getting everyone's parents addicted to the platform
Zuck, you can't be cool, you're too powerful and have done too many terrible things for the sake of money.
You definitely had the chance sometime ago though, which sucks.
Sound's pretty gangsta to me. Isn't being a ruthless G cool?
No one thinks scrounging around for money is going to label you a ruthless G.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jan/17/mark-zuckerb...
It is about 2021 onwards, which should not surprise anyone who has paid attention.
Edit: Also here now, as another user posted: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/3134499/mark-z...
Which, makes sense, given Trump was president. Zuckerberg does say prior general warnings about Russian disinformation caused Meta to initially demote it for a period, since it made them skeptical of it. But those warnings weren't related to a specific incident, like the laptop/hard drives/iCloud accounts of Hunter Biden.
Remember all these aspects of ~~LifeLog~~ HandlerDNA visible under the UV Light of PayingAttention?
I mean, we arent getting out of the AI Surveillance state, period - so we may as well be honest about what we are all dealing with here.