One Laptop per Child
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
OLPC seems like a good example of spending too many "innovation tokens" at once. Very difficult to succeed when making a new system with unique hardware components and new software all at once.
Pixel Qi was always one of those companies I thought should have succeeded but didn't.
This a decent walk through of their timeline in tech history:
https://goodereader.com/blog/electronic-readers/the-rise-and...
Still today I would love to have a minimalist 'typewriter' laptop that I could work with just sitting outdoors in full sun.
From my perspective, the point was the software. Getting that software to markets with unreliable electricity and little money would have been a problem without a new type of hardware device. In the end though, it was the hardware that dominated the consciousness, which was too bad. OTOH, if they hadn't tried, that might mean something like 2+ million kids might have had a worse education (assuming that the OLPC machines were useful to their education), so I doubt it is fair to call it a failure.
It definitely wasn't aimed at US or European mainstream success, nor was it even really offered in those markets, so lack of success in those markets is expected.
My octa-core 'phone' with OLED display is useless in sunlight. I tried using it as a sat nav last summer and there were situations of panic near freeway exits when the screen got illegible.
Word. Had same problem today. Hiking off of a beaten path. Useless. Had to actually turn back.-
I guess with the ubiquity of smartphones these days you could say that 'one laptop per child' more or less happened anyway, but not quite in the way anyone imagined.
I owned one (g1g1), and visited a rural village participating in the program. Everyone was pretty excited and things were really happening.
The tech was cool. I dreamt of making the software a bit better (I didn't.)
Alas, even dreams die.
RIP OLPC
Beware! There are haters among you who will poison your every dream for their own!
Like you're imagining, the sort of people whose primary talent is to acquire funding through exciting demonstrations end up hiring people who are good at creating exciting demonstrations, as a correlation. The MIT Media Lab (where OLPC originated) was all about exciting demonstrations.
Other "exciting" agencies were involved: Pentagram owned the UI/UX design work despite, I think, never having worked on software design/development before.
(In OLPC's case I think all of this turned out surprisingly well, but people will disagree. It's easy to say "oh they should have used Android/iOS" before realizing that neither existed at the time.)
Different goals and different societies, but still - I’m sure developing countries have screen addiction issues too.
But much more so, the software ideas were so interesting. We criticize the platform readily for being used as just another OS, but who else has dared to try to build a learnable intelligible computer? Who else has better ideas we can talk about?
Taking the already existing DBus that underpins the rest of the FreeDesktop world was smart. Using meshed link-local XMPP to network DBus was a hop switch and jump further, reusing so much, but making an interesting cross-system networked application, one that was learnable & understandable & in reach as well as powerful & networked. Such a smart way to take what already was & go just a little further.
I really wish there had been a longer run of trying to grow into it. Most remarkable to me is that there haven't been any attempts at constructivist systems since. We can pan and dump on this aplenty, but what are we doing to try to give broad views of computing to kids, to make accessible the system itself? Who else has tried? This was a great economical attempt given very little time space and opportunity to grow into itself, and that's a shame.
[0] https://www.theverge.com/2018/4/16/17233946/olpcs-100-laptop...
[1] https://philanthropydaily.com/the-spectacular-failure-of-one...
Here in Massachusetts, USA we're on the One Chromebook Per Child plan. Seems to mostly work OK.
Even though the project may not have been succesful, I therefore think it had a pretty strong impact on the democratization of computing, and may also have influenced the development of Chromebooks.