I am sitting on my hands to resist the temptation to send this to my creationist aunt and uncle (who are otherwise great people).
Leave them be, you're not going to convince them of anything (if they are set in their beliefs) any more than they will convince you, no matter how much you'll claim "well I believe them if they show me proof". You wouldn't, as they can just point all around you for proof but you're not accepting it, and neither would they if shown proof of dinosaurs on different continents from millions of years ago.
Their beliefs don't affect you, or, only as much as you let them. It really doesn't matter that you're right. What do you think you look like if you send them "proof" without them asking for it?
While it makes for good script on headlines, it makes terrible arguments for creationists.
They use that vaguely misleading headline as a reason to discredit the entire premise of the article.
Source: my creationist family members who did that.
If you believe in Simulation Theory, you are a creationist!
He said, and it amuses me to this day, no one takes the creation story literally!
So there he was, in a strong relationship with a sister who he had known his entire life and didn't know that she took the creation story literally whereas he took it more poetically. And they grew up in the same household.
Yeah, this simply can't happen in just hundreds of years.
Ed: though I suppose that implies less than it ideally would about the attitudes of random believers on the street, who might well be a lot less principled about where they let divine interference into their model...