> I wonder what caught up with him first: the undisturbed sale of hard drugs vIa telegram, or the undisturbed recruitment of freelancers for GRU's terrorist attacks across Europe.
Seems there could be some truth to the accusations.
> I wonder what caught up with him first: the undisturbed sale of hard drugs vIa telegram, or the undisturbed recruitment of freelancers for GRU's terrorist attacks across Europe.
Seems there could be some truth to the accusations.
Telegram's policy is apparently to not moderate anything, and ignore law enforcement requests.
I'm not saying Telegram is right or wrong here, just that their behavior may not be legal in places like France.
Well, if this guy starts damage controlling, this is definitely a CIA operation
People are complex creatures.
Cant say I have good things to say about Telegram founders and operators. Its not some innocent "free speech" messenger app, its sinister
As for those South Korea-related stories, the blame is partially on the government. For example, an operator of a website selling illegal videos got only 18 months in that country [1].
100 times yes. So where are laws and regulations for the money?! Oh wait. They exist :)
I thought Reagan beat that with his war on drugs? Obviously flippant comment, but wouldn't it be more appropriate to say "Te....chnology has single handedly responsible for the recent drug epidemic,", to which I would answer 'No, it's always been about dollar bills, and what 'recent' drug epidemic?" The US opioid crisis wasn't fuelled by telegram.
Reagan in South Korea? Are you reading only half of the words in each sentence?