Those Greek Riots
theatlantic.com
theatlantic.com
It's hard to tell if greece is a 'last of the mohicans' kind of country where the social fabric is still strong and therefore a lot of 'law and order' policies where the govt cracks down on the people are less tolerated, or if it is a first of a new phase of unrest all over europe and the world. Time will tell I guess.
The history of Greece - both the current protests and the political history described in the article - are simply another playing out of some common patterns:
The US meddles in a country, a military dictatorship rises, the country is exploited, student protests follow. (e.g. most of the countries in South America.)
Mainstream politics undergoes a homogenisation: the number of influential political parties goes down, the policies of the remaining parties become more closely aligned. (e.g. England.)
Riots are sparked by a specific event, but are actually caused by socio-econonic divisions. (e.g. Paris.)
I've just made some horrible generalisations. However, the linked article offers no insight into the particular situation in Greece. History is briefly explained but then disregarded (the military government). General conclusions are drawn without any real evidence (riots in response to poverty). The current events described are linked to something that is getting a lot of headlines (the credit crunch).
Peter Moskos has been writing about the Greek riots for a few weeks now --- http://www.petermoskos.com --- and the picture he paints make the situation in Greece sound very different from student riots in South America (and also different from Kaplan's somewhat alarmist take).
I wasn't trying to make any points about the particular situation in Greece. I was trying to say that, yes, the author cites some facts, but that he disregards the stuff he provides evidence for (the political situation is Greece over the last forty years), then draws conclusions that he doesn't provide evidence for (the circumstances that have brought about the current riots).