Yes, let's just focus on small stuff we already do instead of the big elephant in the room of automated cars with less human error...
Sometimes I can't even on this website with supposedly some of the smartest folks.
Sometimes I can't even on this website with supposedly some of the smartest folks.
This is the same thinking that got everyone chasing "Hyperloop" pixie dust instead of just putting in the work to build high speed rail.
No, you don't
> automated cars with less human error.
The comment you replied to already noted that this has no effect on existing cars, of which many magnitudes more exist than automated cars (those do not exist on the road, not to the degree that is proposed).
> Sometimes I can't even on this website with supposedly some of the smartest folks.
Oh, the irony.
Yes, quite funny. The claim is absurd. Cars communicating with each other is feasible even for older vehicles.