Hacker News Reader

> So, it's a 2 GW power link, not a 20 GW power link

Yup, my bad. Title is wrong but I can't change it now. I was looking for quick figures and saw the solar capacity numbers and put them. It seems only about 1.75 GW are actually planned to go through that link.

View on HN

Maybe @dang can help with the title

Happy to, but can someone suggest what a better (i.e. more accurate and neutral) title would be?

p.s. @dang doesn't work, which is why I didn't respond to this sooner. For guaranteed message delivery, you (or someone) need to email hn@ycombinator.com.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com