- frameworks
- hardware
- foundation models (OS vs 3rd party)
- evaluation & training data
Did the performance gains justify the investment for fine-tuning?
- frameworks
- hardware
- foundation models (OS vs 3rd party)
- evaluation & training data
Did the performance gains justify the investment for fine-tuning?
An example of this is DeepSeek-Coder, which can essentially be considered a fine-tune of a fine-tune of a Mixtral model. It performs very similarly to Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which is pretty damn impressive, but it does it at less than 1/10th the cost.
What I don't understand though is why anyone would even remotely consider fine tuning a GPT-4o model that they will never fully own, when they could spend the same resources on fine tuning a Llama3.1 model that they will own. And even if you absolutely don't care about ownership (???), why not do a fine tune of an Anthropic model which is already significantly better than GPT-4o. At this point, with the laggard performance of OpenAI and their shameless attempts at regulatory hostility to competitors, I can't imagine ever giving them any of my money, let alone owning my derivative work.
I've not heard that anywhere else. My impression from https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder-33b-base was that DeepSeek-Coder was trained from scratch.
I’m now getting conflicting information about the origin of the deepseek MOE framework, so I may be wrong about it starting with a Mixtral model.