> "pattern" (which _should_ be used with respect to a specific design problem, per the Gang of Four)
Why is that true? Particularly if you're not an OOP user/believer. It's not like "pattern" is some obscure term of art.
Why is that true? Particularly if you're not an OOP user/believer. It's not like "pattern" is some obscure term of art.
This is how not to do it – for same problem, use same solution. I admit that's an extreme case but it's also a real one and illustrates the issue well.
(also patterns are not specific to OO, nor is OO incompatible with a functional style)
[0] https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/design-patterns-element...
I understood that was exactly what you were saying! Sorry, I'd had a drink.